Second Circuit Reiterates that Prison Time for Supervised Release Violations Come Off Any Future Term of Supervised Release

United States v. Gaye, No. 22-251, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 20157 (2d Cir. Aug. 4, 2023)

In 2019, Gaye’s encounters with the law led to a supervised release violation and another six-month prison term, followed by four years of supervised release. In 2021, he once again breached the terms of his supervised release, resulting in a three-year prison sentence and five years of supervised release. However, both parties agreed that the new five-year term exceeded the legal limit. The law, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), stipulates that the maximum supervised release term should not exceed the statutory maximum for the original offense, minus any prison time due to violations.

Gaye sought a de novo resentencing, allowing the district court to reconsider both prison and supervised release terms. The government proposed a limited remand, reducing the supervised release term to eighteen months. The court sided with Gaye, opting for a de novo resentencing. This approach empowers the district court to balance prison and supervised release terms within the boundaries of the law.

I'm passionate about federal litigation. I love it so much I became a certified paralegal and I contract with law firms doing legal research and writing.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings

GDPR

Discover more from ZEN LAW GUY PARALEGAL

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading